Christianity Politically Useless?
In Chapter 1 of his book, Hart states a thesis: “My argument is that the basic teachings of Christianity are virtually useless for resolving America’s political disputes.” (p. 11) Christianity “is an essentially otherworldly faith.” (p. 16) The teachings of Christianity, however, are quite germane to resolving the issue that has roiled American politics more than any other issue over the past 33 years, abortion. Here is Christianity’s teaching: murder is immoral because it unjustly destroys a person made in God’s image. (Gn 9:6) Furthermore, it is the state’s God-given responsibility to restrain evil men who kill children before they are born and to use force to do so. (Romans 13) Christianity’s contribution to this American political issue is to tell the civil authorities to do their God-given job and enforce God’s law against murder. We can say this in many different ways, but that is the heart of our contribution to this political debate. It is therefore incorrect that the basic teachings of Christianity are virtually useless for our nation’s deciding of political issues, when it most decidedly has clear use for a very central issue, abortion.
Unless, that is, Christianity, as an “otherworldly religion,” is redefined to include only doctrine about man, God, salvation, and the life to come, with at most a private ethics. WSC Q.2, however, correctly teaches that the Bible’s teaching has two main thrusts, not just one: what man is to believe concerning God and what duty God requires of man. Therefore, the Catechism expounds the sixth commandment. It requires all lawful efforts to preserve the life of others and forbids taking away the life of our neighbor unjustly. How? Not by vigilante action, but by the lawful justice of the state. Any account of Christianity that slights ethics or puts ethics in only a private sphere is seriously at odds with how the Church has understood its faith throughout its history.
Anthony Cowley
March 27th, 2007 at 1:28 pm
My present denomination, the Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church (formerly known as the Seceders) has the following modification to the Westminster Confession 23:3 - what think ye? - :
III. The civil magistrate may not assume to himself administration of the word and sacraments, or the power of the keys of the kingdom of heaven;e yet, as the gospel revelation lays indispensable obligations upon all classes of people who are favored with it, magistrates as such, are bound to execute their respective offices in a subserviency thereunto, administering government on Christian principles, and ruling in the fear of God, according to the directions of his word; as those who shall give an account to the Lord Jesus, whom God hath appointed to be the judge of the world.f Hence, magistrates, as such, in a Christian country, are bound to promote the Christian religion, as the most valuable interest of their subjects, by all such means as are not inconsistent with civil rights; and do not imply an interference with the policy of the church, which is the free and independent kingdom of the Redeemer; nor an assumption of dominion over conscience.g
e II Chron. 26:18; with Matt. 18:17; and Matt. 16:19; Eph. 4:11-12; I Cor. 4:1-2; Rom. 10:15; Heb. 5:4.
f Isa. 49:7, 23; Rev. 21:24; Col. 3:17; II Sam. 23:3; II Cor. 5:10; Ps. 122:9; Ezra 7:23, 27-28; Rom. 13:3-4, 6.
g Ps. 2:10-12; John 18:36-37; James 4:12; Rom. 14:4; [See also letters "e" and "f"].