<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The usefulness of Christianity for politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deregnochristi.org/2007/03/27/the-usefulness-of-christianity-for-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deregnochristi.org/2007/03/27/the-usefulness-of-christianity-for-politics/</link>
	<description>The Reign of Christ</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 20:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Cowley</title>
		<link>http://deregnochristi.org/2007/03/27/the-usefulness-of-christianity-for-politics/#comment-567</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Cowley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 01:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deregnochristi.org/2007/03/27/the-usefulness-of-christianity-for-politics/#comment-567</guid>
		<description>Of course, Biblical Postmillennialism does not say that things are getting better because we see it, or know it.  You are right - it is God's word that says it.  Yes, Mathison does a great argument, exegetical and logical for postmil views.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, Biblical Postmillennialism does not say that things are getting better because we see it, or know it.  You are right - it is God&#8217;s word that says it.  Yes, Mathison does a great argument, exegetical and logical for postmil views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D Hart</title>
		<link>http://deregnochristi.org/2007/03/27/the-usefulness-of-christianity-for-politics/#comment-506</link>
		<dc:creator>D Hart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deregnochristi.org/2007/03/27/the-usefulness-of-christianity-for-politics/#comment-506</guid>
		<description>I much appreciate point #2 in Daniel Howe's post.  I have long suspected that Englishness fueled American exceptionalism.  Though it has certainly been ironic for the Scots and Scotch-Irish to embrace such exceptionalism.  It reminds me of a line by the intellectual historian, David Hollinger, that multi-culturalism has done what 400 years of English rule never could -- turn the Irish into Anglos.

On the politics of the church and N.T. Wright I am a little less comfortable.  Wright sounds to me like Hauerwas.  I like the latter's defense of sectarianism.  But I fear both men fail to recognize the two kingdoms of the current age and make it a zero-sum contest between either Caesar or Christ.  I believe Christian citizens have duties to each that need to be juggled -- sort of like Daniel in exile -- but that may give away the punchline of A Secular Faith.

For me the place to find Christianity's politics is in the Book of Church Order -- always a fun read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I much appreciate point #2 in Daniel Howe&#8217;s post.  I have long suspected that Englishness fueled American exceptionalism.  Though it has certainly been ironic for the Scots and Scotch-Irish to embrace such exceptionalism.  It reminds me of a line by the intellectual historian, David Hollinger, that multi-culturalism has done what 400 years of English rule never could &#8212; turn the Irish into Anglos.</p>
<p>On the politics of the church and N.T. Wright I am a little less comfortable.  Wright sounds to me like Hauerwas.  I like the latter&#8217;s defense of sectarianism.  But I fear both men fail to recognize the two kingdoms of the current age and make it a zero-sum contest between either Caesar or Christ.  I believe Christian citizens have duties to each that need to be juggled &#8212; sort of like Daniel in exile &#8212; but that may give away the punchline of A Secular Faith.</p>
<p>For me the place to find Christianity&#8217;s politics is in the Book of Church Order &#8212; always a fun read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Howe</title>
		<link>http://deregnochristi.org/2007/03/27/the-usefulness-of-christianity-for-politics/#comment-496</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Howe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deregnochristi.org/2007/03/27/the-usefulness-of-christianity-for-politics/#comment-496</guid>
		<description>No ... decent? Honestly, my growing conviction as to the complexity of human endeavor and life in a fallen world has made me totally incredulous toward postmillenialism (or premillenialism). How can anyone say with a straight face "things are getting better (or worse)"? It takes a breadth and depth of knowledge available to the Creator, who says that the wheat and tares are growing up side by side. That is the height of modern (and non-modern) epistemic arrogance, in my view. What does Mathieson have to say?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No &#8230; decent? Honestly, my growing conviction as to the complexity of human endeavor and life in a fallen world has made me totally incredulous toward postmillenialism (or premillenialism). How can anyone say with a straight face &#8220;things are getting better (or worse)&#8221;? It takes a breadth and depth of knowledge available to the Creator, who says that the wheat and tares are growing up side by side. That is the height of modern (and non-modern) epistemic arrogance, in my view. What does Mathieson have to say?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Cowley</title>
		<link>http://deregnochristi.org/2007/03/27/the-usefulness-of-christianity-for-politics/#comment-487</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Cowley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 05:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deregnochristi.org/2007/03/27/the-usefulness-of-christianity-for-politics/#comment-487</guid>
		<description>Daniel:
Good to hear from you.  Have you read Mathieson's book on Postmillennialism?  
Tony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel:<br />
Good to hear from you.  Have you read Mathieson&#8217;s book on Postmillennialism?<br />
Tony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
