<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Justification</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deregnochristi.org/2007/09/21/justification/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deregnochristi.org/2007/09/21/justification/</link>
	<description>The Reign of Christ</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://deregnochristi.org/2007/09/21/justification/#comment-1738</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 04:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deregnochristi.org/2007/09/21/justification/#comment-1738</guid>
		<description>Darryl, what writings on justification are you referring to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darryl, what writings on justification are you referring to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D Hart</title>
		<link>http://deregnochristi.org/2007/09/21/justification/#comment-1732</link>
		<dc:creator>D Hart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 01:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deregnochristi.org/2007/09/21/justification/#comment-1732</guid>
		<description>It's not my blog so I'm not sure my vote counts.  I will say that if this discussion proceeds I have found Peter's writings on justification to give me no comfort, which is remarkable given his earlier statements on assurance and the pastoral concern to comfort the doubter with the means of grace.  The Protestant doctrine of justication is one of the most precious I know, and something that makes Rome unthinkable.  I cannot for the life of me -- to return to our lead question -- see why any Presbyterian, nay Protestant, would want to tinker with justification.  Talk about pastoral.  It's the pastor's trump card with the devil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not my blog so I&#8217;m not sure my vote counts.  I will say that if this discussion proceeds I have found Peter&#8217;s writings on justification to give me no comfort, which is remarkable given his earlier statements on assurance and the pastoral concern to comfort the doubter with the means of grace.  The Protestant doctrine of justication is one of the most precious I know, and something that makes Rome unthinkable.  I cannot for the life of me &#8212; to return to our lead question &#8212; see why any Presbyterian, nay Protestant, would want to tinker with justification.  Talk about pastoral.  It&#8217;s the pastor&#8217;s trump card with the devil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W.H. Chellis</title>
		<link>http://deregnochristi.org/2007/09/21/justification/#comment-1731</link>
		<dc:creator>W.H. Chellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 23:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deregnochristi.org/2007/09/21/justification/#comment-1731</guid>
		<description>I think we would be very interested in pursuing this discussion further.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we would be very interested in pursuing this discussion further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
