<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Protestant Kirk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deregnochristi.org/2008/01/17/the-protestant-kirk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deregnochristi.org/2008/01/17/the-protestant-kirk/</link>
	<description>The Reign of Christ</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 05:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: W.H. Chellis</title>
		<link>http://deregnochristi.org/2008/01/17/the-protestant-kirk/#comment-2760</link>
		<dc:creator>W.H. Chellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 02:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deregnochristi.org/2008/01/17/the-protestant-kirk/#comment-2760</guid>
		<description>It is interesting to me how often I find myself rooting for Obama in the Democratic race.  I was really disappointed on New Hampshire night.  

Obama's comments about individualism, community, and the flight from authentic "homes" is impressive.  His 2004 DNC speech was striking.  Most recently we have his invocation of Ronald Reagan.  

I am not going to vote for the guy but it is sure better than Clinton-ism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting to me how often I find myself rooting for Obama in the Democratic race.  I was really disappointed on New Hampshire night.  </p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s comments about individualism, community, and the flight from authentic &#8220;homes&#8221; is impressive.  His 2004 DNC speech was striking.  Most recently we have his invocation of Ronald Reagan.  </p>
<p>I am not going to vote for the guy but it is sure better than Clinton-ism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W.H. Chellis</title>
		<link>http://deregnochristi.org/2008/01/17/the-protestant-kirk/#comment-2759</link>
		<dc:creator>W.H. Chellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 02:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deregnochristi.org/2008/01/17/the-protestant-kirk/#comment-2759</guid>
		<description>The question about natural law in Thomas and Augustine is a good one.  I would like to give it a full answer.  Better than can be done in a comment.  I am afraid I will have to ask for your patience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question about natural law in Thomas and Augustine is a good one.  I would like to give it a full answer.  Better than can be done in a comment.  I am afraid I will have to ask for your patience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Steffen</title>
		<link>http://deregnochristi.org/2008/01/17/the-protestant-kirk/#comment-2758</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Steffen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 00:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deregnochristi.org/2008/01/17/the-protestant-kirk/#comment-2758</guid>
		<description>I'd be interested to get y'all's thoughts on this article in the Prospect: Obama the conservative.
http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/article_details.php?id=9988</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be interested to get y&#8217;all&#8217;s thoughts on this article in the Prospect: Obama the conservative.<br />
<a href="http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/article_details.php?id=9988" rel="nofollow">http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/article_details.php?id=9988</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Steffen</title>
		<link>http://deregnochristi.org/2008/01/17/the-protestant-kirk/#comment-2756</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Steffen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deregnochristi.org/2008/01/17/the-protestant-kirk/#comment-2756</guid>
		<description>What is the distinction between Thomist and Augustinian natural law?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the distinction between Thomist and Augustinian natural law?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neiswonger</title>
		<link>http://deregnochristi.org/2008/01/17/the-protestant-kirk/#comment-2752</link>
		<dc:creator>neiswonger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deregnochristi.org/2008/01/17/the-protestant-kirk/#comment-2752</guid>
		<description>The Protestant and Reformed tradition is, ethically, a natural law tradition.  When we lose this we lose much.  And as written, it is a specifically Augustinian, and not so much a Thomistic natural law tradition.  The Protestant Reformation itself could in many ways be viewed as a revival of Augustinian theology after a few hundred years of the dominance of Aristotle and Aquinas.  Luther and Calvin were strong Augustinians and clear thinkers on the issues of natural law.  The idea that the knowledge of, and duty to, God's law is not universal both in its application and apprehension is neither our traditional nor confessional approach to these things.

Neiswonger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Protestant and Reformed tradition is, ethically, a natural law tradition.  When we lose this we lose much.  And as written, it is a specifically Augustinian, and not so much a Thomistic natural law tradition.  The Protestant Reformation itself could in many ways be viewed as a revival of Augustinian theology after a few hundred years of the dominance of Aristotle and Aquinas.  Luther and Calvin were strong Augustinians and clear thinkers on the issues of natural law.  The idea that the knowledge of, and duty to, God&#8217;s law is not universal both in its application and apprehension is neither our traditional nor confessional approach to these things.</p>
<p>Neiswonger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
