Comments on: RP Declaration on Justification

By: FV Resources?

FV Resources? — Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:06:34 +0000

[...] [...]

By: Polites

Polites — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 22:25:22 +0000

I’ll only add to Josh’s and Caleb’s comments — mimicking what this statement essentially does in relation to the PCA, OPC, etc. statements — by saying, “Yeah, yeah, what they said.”

By: Josh M.

Josh M. — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:47:45 +0000

Ditto, Mr. Stegall. Are we to be condemned for listening to a Doug Wilson sermon or for reading a Canon Press book?

By: Caleb Stegall

Caleb Stegall — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:21:20 +0000

Holy Canoly, what a terrible resolution. Doesn’t the RP church have anyone trained in cannon law, or just a plain old lawyer they could stick on the committee? It is a fundamental principle of justice that no one can be made to answer a general indictment, because it is impossible to defend against such an indictment. So now Synod has condemned as contrary to scripture those views “generally associated” with NPP or FV. This is lazy, shoddy work and amounts to gross ecclesial negligence. Let the show trials begin!!!

By: Another Rejection of Federal Vision « Reformed Musings

Another Rejection of Federal Vision « Reformed Musings — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 01:20:31 +0000

[...] Another Rejection of Federal Vision Although the RPCNA produced a document on justification some time ago that rejected both Federal Vision and the New Perspective on Paul, their Synod just recently and formally accepted the recommendations of that document (HT: De Regno Christi): [...]

By: RPCNA Rejects NPP and FV « Heidelblog

RPCNA Rejects NPP and FV « Heidelblog — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:36:32 +0000

[...] June 25, 2008 in Covenant, Justification, Pastoral Ministry | Tags: and pastoral ministry, covenant, federal vision, justification, New Perspective(s) on Paul, RPCNA | HT: Bill Chellis at DRC. [...]